Too Much to Drink

By Kevin Greene

The Krats have come out to play! The senatorial elections of 2010 are looking to be some of the bloodiest ever. The Krats are locked in a massive brawl... let me show it to you.

Perhaps the worst, hardest, blood-and-gutsiest Krat primary to date is Pennsylvania, where incumbent Sen. Arlen Specter (pictured lying on the floor) and Rep. Joe Sestak (throwing chair) are at each-others throats.

According to Specter, Sestak is "ineffective" and "opportunistic". He's attacked Sestak for not registering to vote until he started his congressional campaign in 2006, and attacking him for how many votes he's missed while looking at the senate. Sestak has been just as venomous, naturally referring to his long term Republican record and then his recent switch to Democrat.

It looks just as evil in Kentucky, where Lt. Gov. Dan Mongiardo (attempting a dropkick) and state Attorney General Jack Conway (narrowly missing Mongiardo's kick)have been slugging it out for quite some time.

In the past week, Mongiardo accused Conway of investing millions of dollars in a Texas energy company “that favors natural gas over developing Kentucky coal”, and thenfor failing to disclose his purchases of stock in the firm. Conway turned it around and accused Mongiardo of also investing in energy against Kentucky.

Meanwhile, the race in Colorado is only just beginning to get interesting. Appointed Sen. Michael Bennet (falling backward) and former state house speaker Andrew Romanoff (triumphantly landing a punch) have started slamming each other now, too.

And, we can't leave out Illinois; the senators there have their dukes up (left; former Chicago inspector General David Hoffman, right; State Treasurer and front-runner Alexi Giannoulias.) Hoffman charged Giannoulias as "unelectable" because of his past career as a banker, and a pollster of his has also said that Giannoulias “would put Barack Obama’s former Senate seat in extreme jeopardy for the Democrats.”

What does all this mean for us conservatives? A tough primary often leaves the winner drained of cash and worn out from a fight, whereas the opponents are ready and willing to bring it on, like uncontested Republican candidate Pat Toomey in Pennsylvania's seat. It means, that there's fighting inside the enemy camp, it means we can organize and ambush, and it means the Republicans can come out on top in 2010: a sight I know I want to see.

Current Hemerrhoid

By Kevin Greene

An article by POLITICO flamboyantly describes Democrat Arkansas Sen. Blanche Lincoln's decision on the days leading to the procedural vote on the health care debate which happened yesterday. In the end, Lincoln placed the final vote on the health care bill, which was (thankfully) just a vote to hear the bill. Lincoln turned out to be the swing vote; the crucial 60th senator to vote to pass the bill.

POLITICO opens their article with this; "[Lincoln] was a day away from casting a vote that could change her political career when she got a phone call from someone who knew what she was going through.

“I know you’re tired, but we need a glass of wine,” Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), the fellow centrist who also had not yet announced her position, said she told Lincoln."

Two other Krat (I'm trying this term out so I don't have to write 'Democrat" all the time. You like?) senators escorted Lincoln and Landrieu to dinner at an Italian restaurant, at which, according to Lincoln, health care was only briefly discussed.

According to POLTICO, she had already made up her mind at that point anyway. However, she reportedly warned Krats that she wasn't a confirmed vote.

It was speculated that she definitely waited too long, as her indecisiveness was used as cannon fodder from her 2010 opponents.

Lincoln would have been the ultimate 'Idiot' from Idiots & Patriots, had she been the swing vote on passing the entire health care bill. Because this was just a bill to discuss the health care plan, Lincoln's vote was merely annoying. Still, centrists never fly with me. Come on, Louisiana! Throw out your moderate centrists and put in a real conservative! Perform the hemorrhoidectomy!

An American Patriot

By Tony Ciarlante

I am an American Patriot. Let me define what I mean by this. Technically, anyone born in the USA is an American, just like anyone born in Russia is a Russian; those born in Mexico are Mexicans, etc. HOWEVER, being an American or calling yourself an American means so much more than just being born elsewhere and calling oneself an Italian, or a German, or a Cambodian – saying that you are an American says a bit more to those others, and to ourselves.

Now, defining myself as an American Patriot I am highlighting that “other” meaning. A person doesn’t have to be born in the USA to be an American – they can emigrate here and adopt the American values of freedom and individuality, entrepreneurship, the Judeo-Christian morals of honesty, hard work, fairness, compassion, and genuine goodness.

That’s what makes an American different, that’s what sets us apart from the rest of the world. Our belief with the founders of this nation that, “We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

There are no caste systems here; no one is born into a situation that they don’t have the freedom to change, and ample opportunity to make those changes. No lords and masters, no peasants, no serfs, no untouchables – here we have opportunity for all. Anyone can come to America and leave all of that stuff behind and find the freedom to express their own individuality in the pursuit of whatever makes them happy. Believing in these ideals is what makes me an American Patriot.

As an American Patriot I believe with the Founders that these unalienable rights – Rights that no man can put a lien against – come to people from the Creator, from God. God Himself has endowed human beings with the Right to Life, the Right to Liberty, the Right to pursue their own Happiness. Here in America no one can force you to be a farmer, or a machine operator, a truck driver, an electrician, a janitor – or force you to live in a city, or on a farm, or tear you away from family and relocate you to live and work thousands of miles from home, family and friends as soviet style communism did and as many governments still do today.
In America today we don’t even have military conscription; even our soldiers who defend us are all volunteers, when practically every other nation on earth has a military draft, forcing their youth into involuntary military service averaging two years. Why don’t we force people in America to serve their country this way? Because to the best of our ability it is our duty to live up to these ideals, to secure these individual God-given Rights that this nation was founded upon, and we only draft when absolutely necessary.

As an American Patriot I believe that the greatest words ever penned by man to describe the foundations of human government were written by Thomas Jefferson. Molded by John Adams and Benjamin Franklin they are found at the start of the second paragraph in the American Declaration of Independence and they are the very foundation upon which this country stands, and I quote,

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.”

After a terrible, bloody nine year long war of independence, in which 1 out of every 3 men in the colonies fought, and 1 in every 8 men died; during which time the people suffered economic collapse, hyper inflation, shortages, rampant disease and epidemics, famines, and in some cases civilians were made military targets so that there were as many civilian deaths from the war as military deaths; after nine bloody years of this the ideals expressed in the Declaration of Independence prevailed, and as Abraham Lincoln so eloquently put it, “Brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”

Was it perfect? No – it was run by imperfect human beings, it couldn’t be perfect – but it was by far the best, founded on the Divinely inspired ideals to which America struggled to attain. This nation tore itself apart in a horrible conflict – the American Civil War – brother against brother, father against son, battling over the ideals set forth in our Constitution as President Lincoln attempted to right the injustices of his day and form a more perfect union.

Abraham Lincoln summed up that conflict eloquently when dedicating the graveyard of the soldiers who had died at the costliest battle in the Civil War, not far from here in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. Lincoln’s opening remarks on that bloody field were, “Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.”

Looking out over the graves of the fallen, President Lincoln finished with this, “That from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

As an American Patriot I revere what those who sacrificed so much over our history to establish and maintain through struggle and hardship and wars; testing our resolve and our dedication to these ideals, as the War for Independence; again when the British invaded in the War of 1812 and burned Washington, DC; and the great test of the American Civil War.

Wars for our very survival fought by us, our fathers, and grandfathers during the last century: World War One, World War Two, and the 50 year struggle known as The Cold War.

All of this struggle and sacrifice birthed a country and bequeathed to us a new nation, a republic, founded upon a Constitution based on the ideals of the Declaration of Independence for which so many died. A Constitution of the people, by the people, and for the people with three central themes:

Federalism, which is the dividing up of governmental powers and authorities so that there is no one central power, no king, no tyrant, or dictator, or despot. No one group or ruling class in control.

Republicanism, which is governing a nation as a republic, emphasizing liberty, popular sovereignty and civic virtue practiced by citizens, it is the rule of law. It is individual rights under a Bill of Rights which it is the duty of government to protect. As Founding Father John Adams defined a republic, “A government of laws, and not of men.”

And the third principal was limited government. That the federal government would only have those powers that were expressly given to it by the Constitution, to do those things that the state and local governments can’t, like national defense, and foreign policy.

As a 17 year old American Patriot I swore an oath to uphold and defend that precious Constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic, as I voluntarily became a citizen-soldier and a guardian of the people and I went off to war, as my father had done before me, to defend our Republic, our Constitution, and the ideals of the Declaration of Independence. That was 35 years ago now.

Maintaining and strengthening these ideals and beliefs throughout all of my adult life, of liberty, equality, republicanism, God-given Rights under rule of law upon which nothing and no one can infringe – my political alignment is now defined as “Conservative”, and for the past two decades it would be further defined as “Christian Conservative.”

We are at a critical crossroads in our country, a turning point which shall decide our destinies as Americans and the future of our next generation. The next several months will be vitally important to shaping these future destinies.

When next I write, I shall expand upon and define what a conservative is, because without an understanding of whom and what we are, we’ve already lost the struggle for the identity of America.

Think upon my words and reflect upon what patriotism and conservatism mean to you, and next time I will show you why they are worth fighting for.

Your Weekly Dose of Weird

By Pierce Martin

An October issue of Time magazine sported an amazingly interesting article. It was dedicated to none other than environmentally-friendly sex objects… okay… whatever... This just goes to show you how sad and pathetic the environmentalists REALLY are.

Ok, first of all, my question is: how many people who use sex toys and/or birth control products are going to care about whether or not they are actually "green"?!? How much of a market for these things could there possibly be?

One example of "green" birth control products is NFP, which stands for Natural Family-Planning. Correct me if I'm wrong here but doesn't that sound like pre-emptive abortion?

Well, apparently not to the fanatically pro-life Catholics (some who don’t even allow condoms). The Catholic Church has smiled upon the Natural Family-Planning, calling it moral, organic, and green.

Apparently, the reason we care about natural birth control is because of ingesting potentially harmful chemicals and pooping them out, polluting our streams. Honestly… it already went through your body and it didn’t kill you. I think there are many more things present in your fecal matter that could kill fish than remnants of RU-486.

One user is a New York actress (which by the way, that's two strikes against her right there) stopped taking pills because of her concern about the excess of estrogen in her body. "I do yoga every day and eat vegetarian," she says. "Why wouldn't I go green in this area of my life?" Uhhh, maybe because it’s…uhhh… stupid? Jeez, use a condom, for Pete’s sake!

What? Sorry? You can’t use a condom? Why is that? Because they aren’t biodegradable?

That’s right. Latex condoms take forever to disintegrate into nothingness (not to mention they could reek havoc on the occasional field mouse). So, never flush your condoms down the toilet.

But, obviously, that’s not good enough for enviro-whackos. We must create biodegradable condoms made of sheepskin (You murdered a sheep for that? Isn’t that some sort of enviro-crime in itself?) that will become mush much quicker.

But for you vegans out there who can’t even handle the sheepskin, it’s no problem! We’ve taken out the dairy protein in latex, and replaced it with cocoa powder. Enjoy!

Another thing that the liberals are worried about is the fact that the personal lubricants, which drugstores sold over eighty million dollars worth in 2008, contain chemicals commonly used in oven cleaner and antifreeze.

Okay then…unless you and you’re “significant other” retreat to the bedroom with a bottle of oven cleaner when you go to do it, I’m figuring you’re probably pretty safe.

The greenos also whine about some plastic products containing phthalates, which has apparently caused premature puberty in girls and low sperm count in boys. Tell me this: why are underage children using this product in the first place? HMMM???

Alternatives to these plastic products are made from mahogany (WTF?), stainless steel (ouch!) and… glass. That products should say on the label: "Falling down is vehemently discouraged while using product."

In the end, it shows you that the enviro-whackos are everywhere… even between your sheets.

Current Hemerrhoid

Peeps flocked to the National Press Club to see none other than Fmr. Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich at a book signing for his memoir "The Governor", with hundreds of different authors.

There were quite a few people in attendance just to speak to him, and several wanted to ask him about his relations with Sen. Obama and other questions that I highly doubt he would've answered. Among those who in attendence were big names like Ann Coulter, Helen Thomas,and Kinky Friedman. But he didn't show.

But then Bill McCarren, the NPC general manager, dropped a bomb on their hopes.

"[Blagojevich] had a scheduling problem, which we found out about at ten o'clock this morning, and a lot of people expected to see him, but he's not here."

Okay, I don't believe that for an instant. Sorry, but I don't. There were a whole bunch of people there ready to ask him questions about him, his book, and other things, and he suddenly "couldn't make it".

Glenn Selig, Blago's publicist, he was honored to have been invited, but was not able to make it due to traveling delays related to some random unknown TV project that we quite conveniently have never heard of. Riiight.

Not showing up for an important book signing is a blow, 'butt' it doesn't make him what you'd call dangerous. So, Blago wins the title of this weeks hemorrhoid.

Victim of the Week

This issue: REAL VICTIM

Sarah Palin's new book 'Going Rouge' has gotten people up in arms. She has been making talk show circles with the likes of Oprah and Katie Couric, and has been a common face on the media.

Her book gives her account of the 2008 presidential campaign, and it has some pretty harsh things to say about a lot of McCain staffers.

While her and her quotes are getting around a lot, she's a one-woman band, getting slammed from many different sides around the media.

For example, Newsweek magazine placed her on the cover of a recent issue. But look at it.

Palin commented on her Facebook page, "The choice of photo for the cover of this week's Newsweek is unfortunate. When it comes to Sarah Palin, this "news" magazine has relished focusing on the irrelevant rather than the relevant. The Runner's World magazine one-page profile for which this photo was taken was all about health and fitness - a subject to which I am devoted and which is critically important to this nation. The out-of-context Newsweek approach is sexist and oh-so-expected by now. If anyone can learn anything from it: it shows why you shouldn't judge a book by its cover, gender, or color of skin. The media will do anything to draw attention - even if out of context."

The LA Times fondly describes Palin as "the GOP's blessing and curse". While the title sounds like it could be an objective, two-sided article... it's not. Not at all. The first paragraph lists Palin's pros as being "the one who popularized the notion that Democrats advocated 'death panels' as part of their healthcare plan", and "Palin's endorsement of Doug Hoffman [of New York's 23rd Congressional District]... helped force a popular moderate Republican politician, Dede Scozzafava, from the race."

While I agree, these are pros, these are the only pros that are listed. Not to mention that Palin's mention of "death panels" is obviously not fondly looked upon by the Times.

The next paragraph is dedicated to quotes from "conservatives", blasting Palin. The listed "conservatives" are New York Times columnist David Brooks, simply because he wrote fondly of the moderate McCain, Peggy Noonan (*gag cough cough wheeze*), and Steve Shmidt, a man whom takes quite a bit of heat from Palin in "Going Rouge".

Reading through a fairly misleading article from The Brisbane Times (Australia), it mentions an incredibly interesting paragraph.

"A new ABC-Washington Post poll finds that Mrs Palin remains a deeply polarising figure who may be unelectable: only 5 per cent of Democrats would definitely vote for her, and only 19 per cent would consider it. Among crucial independent voters, Mrs Palin also faces resistance: 50 per cent said they definitely would not vote for her."

Please tell me why this is such a bad poll? Did those Aussies down-under forget that Palin is the REPUBLICAN candidate? I think 24% potential votes from the opposite camp it's pretty damned amazing, don't you?

The father of Sarah Palin's grandchild, Levi Johnston, had some "interesting" things to say about Palin in an issue of Vanity Fair in October. But what's really splashing across the news is his credibility: He just made the centerfold in a recent edition of Playgirl magazine. Another magazine, this one gay, Unzipped, leaked that he may just pose for them as well.

His posing for pretty pictures doesn't actually disprove any of what he said about Palin in Vanity Fair. It does tell us a bit about his character, though.

But perhaps the worst article comes from The Wall Street Journal.
The first paragraph is made up only of this, "Maybe in their business lives, conservatives are the stern, unforgiving masters of capitalist lore. But when it comes to politics, oh, do they love a whiner!"

Describing "Going Rogue", it writes, "This is the memoir as prolonged, keening wail, larded with petty vindictiveness."

Sarah is fighting back, which is exactly what she should do. I watched her interview with Oprah, and it honestly seemed like she did just fine. Especially because if she hadn't, it would be all over the headlines. What is all over the headlines is her remark on Levi Johnston's porn, calling it "heartbreaking".

Regardless, there's no way Sarah deserves all the negative media she's receiving. Although, it's understandable. A liberal always insults when it's scared. That's how you can tell it apart from the ring-tailed lemur and other rodents.

Idiots & Patriots

THE IDIOT

Lady Bird Johnson had environmentalism.
Betty Ford had breast cancer.
Rosalynn Carter had mental health.
Nancy Reagan had schoolyard drugs.
Barbara Bush had adult illiteracy.
Hillary Clinton had health care.
Laura Bush had childhood reading.

Now, it's time for Michelle Obama to choose her pet project: mentoring high-school-age girls.

Sounds like a noble cause, right?

It's a little bit vague on 'exactly' what will be taught, but Susan Sarandon is involved... this can't be good.

The mentoring program will begin in Denver, Colarado. But I must question this statement of the POLITICO article speaking on this issue. The article states, "East Wing aides said that Denver was chosen because it has such a diverse population of young women. According to U.S. Census Bureau 2008 estimates, 34.4 percent of this city’s population is Hispanic, 10.1 percent is black or African-American, and 3.4 percent is Asian."

That's very interesting... except for the fact the there's nothing to back up the claim of a "diverse population of young women." Giving the U.S. Census estimates of Denver's racial diversity has nothing to do with it's gender diversity.

Yes, I know that has nothing to do with the Idiot, but it bothers me. Either the reporter made a mistake, or there's some kind of cover-up over why Denver was really chosen. Although, it's a pretty bad cover-up.

Either way, because I know so little about Michelle Obama's mentoring platform, I will call it neutral. No reason for her to be the Idiot yet.

However, the POLITICO article quotes Myra Gutin, a first lady historian at Rider University. “She’s the celebrity first lady who is focusing on a number of different things right now, and there may be a lot of wisdom in that. Maybe she realizes that she can multitask..."

Gutin proclaims this multitasking to be some sort of monumental feat. However, Laura Bush had several issues to her name, and every other first lady since Lady Bird Johnson has had multiple issues surrounding them.

It's this that makes Michelle Obama the Idiot here. She has not yet accomplished anything, and her mentoring program doesn't even sound like it is going to do much, and yet she's being praised and recognized as making a move on history. Huh...

THE PATRIOT

Okay, yes, I know there are two people there... bear with me!

Carrie Budoff Brown and Chris Frates were the authors of a hard-hitting article in POLITICO, slamming health care reform.

They raise some excellent points about the health care debate, read the article to see more. I couldn't credit just one of them for writing the article, so I had to include both! I don't want to offend my Patriots!

I am actually not going to give you my spin on this article today. Why? Well... because I don't want to. Brown and Frates have done that enough for me. I'm just pointing you to the article.

Are Brown and Frates the first to discover the health care fallacies? Of course not. They are also not the first to give a profile on them. But they are who I have chosen. They laid the article well and perhaps informed many people of the health care problems. For this, Brown and Frates are co-patriots.

Dope

Obama campaigns to be Chinese emperor!

At least, that's what it sounds like. For some reason unknown to me, Obama thinks holding a town hall for students in China is actually helping some sort of something. Hmmm...

Perhaps we Americans are too wise for him, so he has to now gain the approval of other countries?

I don't really think the president of the greatest country in the world (although I'm starting to lean towards Estonia) should be off giving "town hall meetings" to ask about what Chinese students think about God knows what. Apparently, he's taking questions randomly from around the room, as well as answering questions.

According to Ben Rhodes, the NSC adviser for strategic communications, there will be a live stream on whitehouse.gov to cover the event. However, when asked at a briefing by senior officials if the questions were going to be asked live and unfiltered, Rhodes replied, "Not -- no. I mean, we'd never do that -- I mean, not in the sense that a question is popping up on a screen in front of the President."

Interesting! And when asked if the president will go around the room calling on random people, Rhodes replied, "Yes... The President will deliver brief opening remarks -- 10 to 15 minutes. Then he'll take questions from -- he'll be calling on people in the room. And among -- within that format, there will be questions that have come in via the Internet."

Veeeeery interesting! I expect it to be rigged.

Sorry, but I do! It sounds like POTUS is going to stand there holding a piece of paper reading e-mail messages from "Chinese students" that are really pre-typed questions, with a pre-typed answer underneath. After that, the Q&A period starts, and Obama will call on people from the audience... people rigged there with a question Obama already knew was coming.

Convenient the way it will work! So, just being there in China is dopey enough. But if it goes the way I think it's going to go, then that's even... dopeyer... yes...

Dope [Deleted]

[Deleted due to factual errors. Sorry for any inconvenience]

Current Hemorrhoid

"...you [Republicans] have ideology that’s really not based on any sort of substance that can move an agenda forward, that can really help people in this country.”

Hmmm... I wonder who said that? 'Probably some left-wing ultra-liberal Democrat', you're probably thinking.

Wrong! Those are the words of Dede Scozzafava, the Republican who ran for the New York 23rd congressional district, but dropped out of the running and endorsed the Democrat candidate.

She continued, “I don’t think it’s good for the health of our party. Any party that just tries to purge members that might have any sort of independent thinking, I think, eventually will run itself to very much of a minority status..."

We tried to purge her... get a load of that!

I know little about her stances, although I do know she is anti-baby. When she dropped out, she endorsed the Democrat running in her race, Bill Owens, and not the conservative Independent, Doug Hoffman. Seems to me that she was not exercising "independent thinking", she was thinking like a liberal. Which means she should run like a liberal. You can't claim to be "purged" just because you don't get elected.

However, she says she plans to stay with the Republicans, even after getting ripped out of the New York State Assembly last Monday. Why would she stay in a place she feels like she's not wanted? Well, to explain, Scozzafava said: “You know, the original Republican Party was all about less government interference in the lives of individuals. It was about promoting self-sufficiency versus government dependency.”

I have no idea why that statement has anything to do with anything. Not to mention that what she just proclaimed the Republican party to be, in my view, still is the case. Hoffman, her Independent opponent in her failed election, supported that. Owens, the Democrat, almost certainly did not, as the Democrats are generally for big government.

Whatevs... Scozzafava is a weak Republican; a RINO, like Arlen Specter. If she departed for the Democrats, she would be no loss to the Republicans. Just as Specter was no loss, nor would senators Snowe (R-ME) and Collins (R-ME) if they switched.

Having somebody who votes consistently liberal in a party of conservatives truly is a Republican In Name Only. We could never count on a conservative vote from Specter, and I don't think we can from Scozzafava.

But Scozzafava seems to think differently about her own record, “...I voted 95 percent with my Republican leader in the State Assembly..."

Well, perhaps that is true. But that would only prove the Republican leader to also be a RINO. So, I think we'd all be better off if Scozzafava left the party, and left us all alone. At least she wouldn't be quite as annoying. Think of it as a hemorrhoidectemy.

Idiots & Patriots

THE IDIOT

Last week, congress filed a bill (that I wish I had heard about) to strip ACORN, a left-wing activist group, of it's government funding. Had I actually known of this, I would have driven to their headquarters and danced in front of it. Okay, no I wouldn't. But I would have celebrated by whooping it up with Cheez-its and fruit punch, k?

Anyway, back on topic... ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis basically cried in a press-conference over the matter, and her organization is launching a lawsuit against the government. They claim that the bill was of attainder, meaning it was unfairly directed at one group. That would make it unconstitutional.

However, ACORN is really one to talk... Perhaps you might remember when tapes were filmed of controversial meetings with ACORN officials, in one of which they met with a pimp and prostitute, helping them on tax evasion and setting up a brothel.

Basically, congress had every right/reason to slice them out of taxpayer dollars, that would apparently be funding illegal prostitution houses, as well as God knows what. So, unconstitutional or not, Bertha Lewis is this weeks Idiot.

PATRIOT

Last week, the Republican National Committee realized it had a large fault in its insurance policy: it covered elective abortions.

Obviously, there's a serious issue involved there, as the Republican stance is pro-life. But, apparently, elective abortions have been offered from their insurance company, Cigna, since 1991.

"Money from our loyal donors should not be used for this purpose," RNC Chairman Michael Steele said, "I don't know why this policy existed in the past, but it will not exist under my administration. Consider this issue settled."

Well, then, it's settled! Thank you, Michael Steele, for doing the right thing and acting so quickly. For this, Steele is a Patriot.

2010 Booyah!!!

A national internet "blog", I guess you'd call it, Politico, announced in an article Tuesday it's picks for the top 10 senate seats likely to turn over in the 2010 election. BOOYAH! Most of them are strongly Republican! And they don't even have my second-favorite pick! So, without further delay, take a look at the amazing hope coming next year.

10. New Hampshire

We bid adieu to Sen. Judd Gregg, a great (Republican) senator from The Granite State. Gregg is retiring this year, leaving his senate seat to be widely contested.

Democrats seem to like Rep. Paul Hodes, who has raised around a million bucks in his campaign fund, a modest sum in the world of politics. He has yet to prove himself as a strong candidate, and has already had come under attack for avoiding health care town halls a few months back. On the Republican side of the aisle, former state attorney general Kelly Ayotte is the front-runner, although she faces fierce primary competition from State Board of Education Chairman Ovide Lamontagne and RNC committeeman Sean Mahoney. Regardless, though, I believe the candidate who emerges victorious on the Republican side will have little problem in beating Hodes.

9. Kentucky

Goodbye, Jim Bunning! We love you! Bunning is also retiring this year, leaving his seat behind him. So we cut to the races...

Both parties are forced to come against major primaries this election. The Democrats are stuck in a bitter struggle for their party's nomination, the candidates being Attorney General Jack Conway and Lt. Gov. Dan Mongiardo. The Republicans, on the other hand, face a battle of their own.

Ever heard of Ron Paul? You know, that Texan who ran for Prez last year, but lost the primaries? Well, his son, Rand, is staring at the nomination for Bunning's seat. But while he's loved more by Kentucky bigwigs and people closer the the far-right, national Republican are endorsing his competitor, Secretary of State Trey Grayson. Grayson is a capable man, and an excellent overall candidate.

Regardless, if the difficult primaries are any indication, Kentucky's seat will be a hard win for either party.

8. Missouri

Farewell, to yet another retiring GOP senator, Kt Bond. Unfortunately, this race is likely to swing Democratic, as MO Secretary of State Robin Carnahan will almost certainly be the leading nominee.

Former Republican congressional whip Rep. Roy Blunt is looking at the title, but it competition will be fierce.

7. Ohio

We say goodbye to yet one more retiring Republican candidate, Ohio Senator George Voinovich. Farewell, George!

Former White House Budget Director Rob Portman is the favorite Republican candidate, and has already raised a hefty hefty hefty 6$ mil to run against the future Dem. nominee Lt. Gov. Lee Fisher. It looks good for Portman to take, which would be very nice, to say the least.

6. Pennsylvania

At last, a race I could tell you so much about! After all, I do live here, right? I've been watching this one.

This is the first race so far that doesn't have an senator retiring. After Sen. Arlen Specter flip-flopping Democrat, his poll numbers have crashed through the floor. Republican candidate Rep. Pat Toomey leads Specter 48% to 36% in the polls.

Remember Specter's immortal party-switching speech? He declared, "I am unwilling to have my 29-year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate..." Well, his 29-year senate record will be be judged by the Pennsylvania Democratic primary electorate. I, as well as many others across the blogosphere, are predicting fiercely that Specter will not even take his new party primaries, and that it will, in fact, be Rep. Joe Sestak, who will face the unchallenged Toomey in the election.

5. Illinois

Dost thou rememberist when Obama won election? Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich was impeached for trying to sell his senate seat? Well, Democrat Sen. Roland Burris ended up taking it, but he apparently isn't staying long: he's now retiring.

This forced Democrats to scramble around trying to find someone they like, as their original pick, Attorney General Lisa Madigan, declined to run. They have finally emerged with their front-runner Alexi Giannoulias, Illinois state Treasurer.

The tough blue-state is looking like a win for the Republicans now. They've chosen Rep. Mark Kirk, who's stubbornly held a congressional seat in suburban Chicago, a feat in itself. So, we're hoping that we can finally nail a Republican into office in a state full of Democrats.

4. Nevada

If there was one race that I could take off this list and replace with one of my own favorites, it would be this one.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is up for re-election in Nevada 2010. Unfortunately, the two Republicans who could have actually taken him out (which would be amazingly wonderfully awesome), declined to run. So, former state Republican Chairwoman Sue Lowden has snatched up the Republican race, but she is most certainly not the favorite against powerhouse Reid.

3. Colorado

Appointed Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet is up for re-election, but he faces a tough primary against former state house speaker Andrew Romanoff. This race is still mysterious and mystical, and we know little about it. With the exception that former Lt. Gov. Jane Norton will most likely be the GOP nominee. But she, too, will face a contested primary.

2. Connecticut

Republicans are looking at a pickup against notorious Sen. Chris Dodd. While navy blue Connecticut is deep in the Democratic camp, Dodd is a weak candidate among Connecticut's citizens. Now, Republicans have to decide who is going to be the winning candidate... out of four good choices. Rep. Rob Simmons, Ambassador Tom Foley, anti-tax activist Peter Schiff, and CEO Linda McMahon will make Connecticut a race to watch closely.

But now, the one I think we've ALL been waiting for... The number one most seat most likely to turnover is...

1. Delaware

Joe Biden moved into the White House, leaving no incumbent in his Delaware senate seat. Republican Rep. Mike Castle jumped on top of it, and it's agreed he's the only senator who might actually make this a good race. It may all depend on Biden's son, Attorney General Beau Biden, who will keep the name bonus from his father.

Now, I could've told you all of that by sending you to the article. But, there's one thing you can't find in that article: my second-favorite pick.

My favorite ranked sixth in Politico's list, that being the Pennsylvania race. But my second-favorite is this:

11. Hawaii

Perhaps this is more what I WANT to see, rather than what will happen. Regardless, 8-term senator Daniel Inouye of Hawaii has, in my opinion, been here waaay too long. Lame-duck Governor Linda Lingle is a potential Republican candidate who, I believe, has the greatest chance of knocking out Inouye than any other candidate ever has.

Inouye will be 86 years old in 2010, meaning by the end of his term, he'll be pushing 90. I hope his old senility will be a factor in his re-election

Overall, I predict a 2010 BOOYAH! So, BOOYAH!!!!

Nose

GOVERNMENT. Loves to nose it's way in and mess around in other people's business.

The California Energy Commission is scheduled to vote on Nov. 18 on a proposal that would limit retailers to selling only television sets that require less power than they do today. A full third less. This is, in particularly, going to harm the HDTV industry.

This would ban the sale of every single plasma TV over sixty inches, and ban about 25% of today's large screen TV's statewide.

Plasma offers the cheapest prices for 50"+ screen televisions. An energy efficient LED TV about the size would cost twice as much. The plasma would cost only 1,200$ online. For the same price, you could receive a 32-inch LED TV.

Meaning what? Well... no manufacturer will make what it can't sell, even if it's only one state. Eventually, due to the California law, we may see this issue across the entire nation.

Plasma Display Coalition president Jim Palumbo cited the California Energy Commission for "its flagrant misinformation campaign." Palumbo's group says the state's site has not been updated to reflect the fact that many newer TV models burn the equivalent energy of two 75-watt household light.

There is no reason for California to stick it's nose in the TV business. They need to address certain issues before they start nailing business from selling in their state. It is simply government meddling in places they have no reason to be in. Because, unfortunately, the CEC never gave any reason or justification on why they were doing this specifically.

I mean, we can guess that it was to save energy. But why start at TV's? If you want to save energy in California, why not ban celebrities?

For example, famous-for-nothing Paris Hilton has an enormously large mansion in the Hollywood Hills area. Perhaps large enough to keep at least 100 of those TV sets.

Or maybe, Oprah Winfrey? Apparently, no one actually knows where she lives. But a palatial mansion twice the size of Paris Hilton's is rumored to be it.

Hulk Hogan has TWO homes. One in California, one in Florida. Both at least the same size as Paris Hilton's.

What if we banned all the stars? For the following, I'm going to say that they could all save 50 TV sets. Ban Frankie Avalon, Harrison Ford, Mel Brooks, Julie Andrews (I heart Julie, but I can make the sacrifice), Ann-Margaret, William Shatner, Carol Burnett (100 TV's for two homes), Steve Martin, Steven Spielberg, Diana Ross, Jim Carrey, Roseanne Barr, Jay Leno, Shirley Jones, Chevy Chase, Bill Cosby, Danny Devito, Bob Dylan, David Hasselhoff, Ron Howard, Madonna, Gary Busey, Cher, Bette Midler, Eddie Murphy, Don Rickles, Julia Roberts, George Clooney, Bruce Springsteen, Tony Danza, Tom Selleck, Charlton Heston, Sylvester Stallone, Shirley Temple, John Travolta, Jane Fonda, and Jamie Lee Curtis. And I only named about a third of the stars who actually live in California.

By my estimations, without even seeing those stars homes, we saved the equivalent energy of 2250 TV sets. And got rid of a mess of pond scum.

Okay, okay. This isn't practical, and all these people have a right to live there, and blah blah blah, I know, I get it. But the point is that there are certainly other things the CEC could have done besides banning TV sets, even if blowing up stars homes wasn't one of them.

Whatevs... the fact is, it's just another place where the government stuck it's nose where it doesn't belong.

Weekly Welcome

Hello, and welcome to the first issue of The Politicker!

We have some real goodies for you today! Among the things we will have each week, we also have, for your reading experience, two stories about the news in general, The Enviro-Formula and The Queen's iPhone. Have fun reading these!

If you'd like to leave a comment and tell me how you liked the first issue, go right ahead! Please include your thoughts on how I could make it better!

R.A.S.H. Award

Remember all the Bush-bashing that went on in the past 8 years? The media always called it "constructive criticism". But, if you say anything remotely bad about the Messiah Barack Obama, you are immediately called a racist.
For instance, Jeff Johnson, a black radio host and our weekly winner of the R.A.S.H. Award, frequently speaks out against the Obama administration. He, as well as second runner-up for the award, black talk show host Tavis Smiley, have been frequently bashed for saying that Obama is…well… not a good president!
They have been called names like “Uncle Tom”, “Obama hater”, and “sellout” by their fellow African-Americans. Why? Well, how about because 91% of blacks love Obama. But, Smiley and Johnson are asking whether we should still look at Obama’s feat of “first black president”, or should we get over that and look at his polices? Apparently, America’s black people want to stay focused on their wonderful Barack Obama. You know, the one who’s screwing America up all over the place while the sheeple stare at his gleaming smile and wonderful achievement. Yes, THAT Barack Obama! *sheesh!*
But what makes these men different from the rest is that they, themselves, are black. It’s one thing for Rush Limbaugh to denounce Obama as president, but for another black man?!? Another homie?!?
So, congratulations, Mr. Johnson! You are our Racist Ageist Sexist Homophobe of the week!

Idiots and Patriots

IDIOT
“If, in the future, banks need exceptional assistance in order to get through this, then we'll make sure that assistance comes with conditions,” The illustrious treasury secretary told us Sunday on CBS, “not just to protect the taxpayer but to make sure this is the kind of restructuring necessary for them to emerge stronger…"
In other words, Timothy Geithner is saying that money is going to go to banks with strings attached to “protect the taxpayer.” But, Geithner followed up his statement with this: “And where that requires a change of management of the board, we'll do that."
Which means… well… it will be a ton of Rick Wagoner’s all over again. Geithner has decided that the federal government has the power to overthrow any company management if they feel its "needed for the best interest of the company."
Now, here, Geithner was only talking of banks. But, was General Motors a bank?
GM CEO Rick Wagoner was thrown out on his caboose two weeks ago as a condition for the government to give GM more taxpayer money.
For pulling our nation farther towards socialism by decided the government can pick and choose the fate of company management, Timothy Geithner is an idiot. But, with GM and AIG heads getting knocked out, expect it to come to a city near you.

PATRIOT
Governor Mark Sanford of South Carolina has told the President what everyone else was too scared to say: Obama is Zimbawinizing America!
Sanford said that something was amiss with the money earmarked for his state. “I was looking over the proposed uses of the funds and proposed programs seemed very socialist to me,” He told reporters on Thursday. He also accused Obama of printing money randomly to fix the economic crisis; “Funny money will not put South Carolina’s unemployed back to work... Funny money just doesn’t have that power.”
Sanford also noticed the similarities between Obama’s plan and Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe’s. Mugabe tried to modernize his country by encouraging spending. His plan has been noted has one of the most potentially disastrous ever proposed.
“Zimbabwe has a staggering 11 million percent interest rate!” Sanford noted, “Can you even fathom that? A gumball would cost $27,500. A vente soy chai skim milk latte with a sprinkle of pumpkin spice would cost $526,900.”
For calling the prez out on this, Mark Sanford is a Patriot. The reason it is him is because he’s the only one who had the guts to do it. Now, pardon me… I’m contemplating moving to South Carolina…

Dope

First, let me say that I tried really hard to keep Obama from being the first “Idiot” from Idiots and Patriots. I tried everything from Howard Stern to Khloe Kardashian, but… well… it was inevitable. Then I thought of just giving him his own section for idiocy. If I don’t, he’ll probably end up taking the ‘Idiot” section every week!

Now, to the story…

“We will convey our deep appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the centuries to shape the world, including in my own country,” Said our President to Turkey on his Apology Tour.
I don’t believe I need to mention the sheer idiocy of this… er… idiotic statement. But, Obama, and people, seem to think that el presidante has something to apologize for, or to. But, over and over, you see him apologizing for America, Americans, or American issues. Like apologizing for the American people being so “arrogant” to Europe. Or for the Iraq war to an Archbishop. Or to Iran(away)’s president Mahmoud Atemydinner-jad for “crimes” over the past 60 years. Or to all African Americans (again) for their great-great-great-great-great-grandparents being brought from Africa to be kept as slaves until a Republican, Christian president freed them all. Or to everyone in every possible section of every possible place in the rest of the world --- so long as he wasn’t the one behind it.
Obama never apologized for anything he’s done. His horrendous porkulus bill, his connections with Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright, his cabinet members, his anti-American statements, his refusal to wear an American flag pin or put his hand over his heart to the Pledge of Allegiance… absolutely nothing. He will only apologize with “Bush did it”, “It’s all the Republican’s”, or… “Bush did it”.
Finally, his bowing to the Saudi king is another kick in America’s pants. Oh, wait… I forgot… he was actually helping to stimulate the economy by picking up a quarter.
He’s the first American President to EVER bow to a king. Quarter, or no quarter.
These are just a few of the things our wonderful president has done or said that was completely anti-American. Just remember that.

Enviro-Formula

Whenever you hear something out of the mouth of an environmentalist whacko, you have to realize that they are sad. I betcha that vegetarians wish they could savor a nice, juicy steak every once in a while instead of munching on tofu. But, they love animals too much. They envy your wonderful life, and since they can’t have it, neither can you. So, they are envious of you.
They've decided that they must protest in order to make themselves feel better. Throwing rocks at whaling boats, hugging trees in the nude, or passing out anti-hamburger literature, it has to stop us. All envy.
Now, here’s the weird one: irony. But, it is very ironic when you stop to think about it! The biggest whacko behind the eco-movement, Al Gore, is a has-been veep and a failed prez candidate. His political career has got to be finished, so, he turns to his whole global warming scheme.
What else is ironic? Well, it’s ironic when People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) workers kill 300 dogs and throw them in trash dumpsters. It’s ironic when the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) picks up 1300 dogs and euthanizes all but 11 of them. It’s ironic when treehuggers cling to their tall, wooden leafed structures in the nude, and then wonder why their getting so little attention. It’s ironic when a solar-powered porta-potty is created, then it stops working because it freezes over.
Finally, environmentalism is only 0.1% mental. These people don’t think at all! “A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy. They’re all mammals.” This philosophical statement was said by Ingrid Newkirk, top dog of PETA. She compares a boy to a rodent. Betcha she wouldn’t feel that way if she had kids. There’s no thought to their lunacy.
For instance, when did it become a crime to own an SUV, or even drive one? Oh, I know! When Laurie David was old enough to drive!
This Hollywood eco-chick pulls alongside Hummers at red lights and yells at the occupants. She’s put tickets on the windshields of gas-guzzlers. I see her as someone with waaay to much time on her hands.
But, she contradicts herself almost worse than Al Gore himself.
If Ms. David took one trip from New York to LA in that private jet of hers, she’d eat enough fuel for the average Hummer to go a year. Her big old Beverly Hills mansion consumes enough energy in a year that it could probably light South America for a few years. People who live in glass mansions shouldn’t throw stones!
But, Laurie is just the TIP of the ice cube.
Global warming is the most monotonous, stupid, annoying, lie-accepted-as-truth that has ever been uttered from the face of liberals. I could go on and on about how wrong an un-factual it is, but I won’t. I’ll just tell you this: Fill a bowl with ice. Now, fill it with water until it’s brimming. Let the ice melt. You will find that the bowl hasn’t even spilled out. Oops! New York hasn’t been flooded today! Let’s try again tomorrow!
Al Gore’s movie, An Inconvenient Truth, is actually just an inconvenient lie. Innocent, fluffy, white polar bears are just dangling off of icebergs helplessly; wastelands and chunks of ice splashing into the ocean… all lies. Utter lies. And yet, people in Sweden, Finland, and several other pathetic European countries, are forced by the government to watch it as if it were truth. Some American schools are even forcing their children to watch the movie of lies.
Sometimes, I wish Laurie would yell at me for driving a Ford Explorer, or Al Gore would force me to watch his film of lies without popcorn. I’d eat them alive. Unless they gave me popcorn…
There’s an easy way to stop Laurie’s problem with SUV’s. Two words: offshore drilling. OOH! Here’s another brilliant solution! Drill in ANWR.
We can solve Al Gore’s ignorance, too. No, wait. That’s impossible. Sorry, never mind.
Remember, global warming is a bald-faced lie. But, the backers ARE liberals. Anything that is uttered out of their mouths is a bald-faced lie.
So, never forget the formula! 90% envy + 9.9% irony + 0.1% mental = environmental.

Current Hemorrhoid

On Monday, actress/liberal witch Roseanne Barr had a few… er… interesting… words to say about conservative talk show host Glenn Beck on her blog, Roseanne World.
I’m going to give you the entire thing, and I will talk about some of the things she says here. First, notice that she rarely uses capital letters. I know, this type of thing is common on the internet and on blogs, but when trying to portray a modicum of intelligence, you follow proper English standards. Everything she said will be in quotation marks.

“GLENN BECK IS STEALING FROM ME!”
“he is a vampire and is vampiring off of my blog. I have been writing about energy vampires here for years! Now I notice he is calling obama and democrats vampires, using all of my verbiage (for which i own the copyright, here at RW).”

Okay, so she owns the word “vampire”. I doubt it highly. Donald Trump tried to copyright “You’re Fired” and Paris Hilton wanted “That’s hot.” Neither of them got it because the statement was much to frequently used. “Vampire”, in any form, is a very common word. Maybe she had a self-proclaimed copyright, but to claim that Beck is stealing from her is… well… stupid.


“this is what he said:" the democrats are trying to vampire off of our businesses, and we need to drive a stake thru their heart." This is calling for race war, it truly is!! Mormons have been programmed to heed the words of their prophets, and glenn beck hangs out with those prophets.”

I do wonder what she means by “race war”. Saying that democrats need to be stopped doesn’t even touch the race issue, let alone the Mormons.

“the truth is glenn beck supports a confederate economy, based on slave wages. He is happy that lots of american citizens have lost their jobs and their homes.”

Note that she has no proof of this for her to say “the truth is”. First, ‘confederate economy” is not a common term that people know, so defining exactly what she means by that is difficult. Second, an economy “based on slave wages” isn’t what he supports. She is making the jump that without Unions, there would be companies taking advantage of their workers, and that these workers would be paid slave wages because of this, so because Beck doesn’t support Unions, he supports slave wages. I can’t say for sure because she didn’t go into it, but that’s what it sounds like.
Finally, he never stated that he is happy about Americans losing homes and jobs. She did. She didn’t give a quote where Beck says “I am happy about Americans losing their jobs and their homes,” she only says that “the truth is”. Thanks for clearing that up, Ms. Barr.

“He is blaming it all on the democrats, who have a black leader. this is subtle racism at its lowest.”

Because the dems have a black leader, and we believe them to be evil, we are racist. Uh… huh…

“He is a republican and is working to elect romney/palin 2012.”

Again, something she only made up. And, even if it was true, only to her audience would that be a bad thing.

“be aware of how the cable channels are sending a despicable racist and anti-worker message into your living rooms. turn off cable news! turn off your televisions if you want to resist being programmed by satan worshippers.”

Now, that’s interesting! Turn your eye back to last year, when America was racist if they didn’t elect Obama as president. We heard, “You don’t like Obama? Must be because he’s black, you racist!” Now we hear that “a despicable racist message” is sent by FOX News. Not to mention “anti-worker”, which doesn’t fit in this paragraph at all. Finally, calling us “satan worshippers” is just not nice. I won’t go into this on the religious aspect, so the most I’ll say is that Roseanne is a meaniehead. ;-)

“But, my dear mr. pro-slavery teenage girl marrying anti gay marriage anti women's rights anti-worker anti constitution america hating traitor polygymist,”

WOW that’s a long name! She decided she’d call him everything she wished he was. Pro-slavery = untrue, teenage-girl marrying = stupid, anti-gay marriage = she says it like it’s a bad thing, anti-women’s rights = in other words, anti-abortion, anti-worker = untrue, anti-constitution = statement unjustified, meaning she doesn’t say why, meaning untrue, America hating = untrue, traitor = she forgot that only democrats are that one, polygamist = see, “teenage-girl marrying.”

“you will not have the last word. the truth will have the last word, and we the minions of freedom fighters who, hear these words and agree that the balance has already tipped against slavery. To reference the story of passover, the slaves walked out of mind control into the LIGHT, split the red sea and walked across on dry land. Forty days and nights later, the slaves witnessed the full measure of their senses as the Hand of the Spirit of Unity wrote the law on saphire tablets in white and black fire!!!”

She needs to learn her Biblical parables! She confused the parting of the Red Sea, The Passover, AND Noah and the Ark. That already tells you that the rest is false and stupid.

“THE LAW WILL PUNISH THE GUILTY!!! they will be named here. Roseanne Barr is the husk that types these words.”

Oh God! If Roseanne Barr gets to punish the guilty, then the world is doomed!

“Prophecy is a meditation, mr. glenn beck german skinhead.”

More simple name-calling.

“mark your doors mr. polygymist, for the angel of "death" will not pass over your house.”

Yet another botched Biblical parable.

(your mask will fall, you'll be exposed-as a "death lover" NEC-TECH-bot/bought)!
(the angel of death is an energy vampire-search vampires here in the archives).

Just plain weird.

“Vampires cannot tolerate to see the CROSS OF CHRIST!
YOUR CHURCH PROTECTS PEDOPHILES AND CHRIST WILL NOT ALLOW THAT ANY LONGER!
CHRIST WILL SPEAK OUT OF THE MOUTHS OF THE MANY MANY VICTIMS YOUR KIND CREATES AND PROTECTS. THIS IS NO JOKE, VAMPIRE POLYGYMIST WOMAN HATER, PEDOPHILE ENABLER!!!”

Suddenly, she believes in Christ! Plus, yet another round of name-calling.


“you are the f***ing vampire dude. vampires are tricky little bastards as they try to speak for god, and pervert the message of peace in their tower of babbling bullsh*t! vampires are pedophiles and pedophiles are vampires.”

Not only do vampires now exist, but they are born pedophiles! Once again, she botches another Bible story, this one about the Tower of Babbling Bulls**t.

“THIS IS THE CROSS OF CHRIST (pick it up if you dare):
" send the suffering children to me, I will access/harness their hatred of evil, so to create heaven". pedophiles love the suffering of children. They love to make children doubt the truth.

This time, she deliberately screwed up Jesus’ words… as well as adding her own. She has now perverted the word of God.

“there is no doubt of that! do not doubt what your eyes tell you and your senses sense. you are being lied to by greedy perverts and death dealers!
FALL BABYLON!!!!!!”

Now, this is me talking. This entire post was riddled with hatred-spewing, mind-boggling, anti-republican, anti-Jesus, crazy, off-the-deep-end bullcrap. Which makes Roseanne Barr our current Hemorrhoid.

The Queen's iPhone

Ya know, in this society, everybody is up-to-date technologically. Even the Queen of England.
For the sophisticated Queen Elizabeth II, Barack Obama has left a gift. He arrived in England for the G20 summit last Tuesday, and has made a stop to see the Queen.
For her present, he gave her an iPhone, “filled with tokens of American culture.”
“I wanted to give Queen Elizabeth a piece of America,” Obama later explained, “While our countries are similar, our pop culture can be quite different.” And, for the rest of meeting, the American president showed the Queen how to use her new device.
The president also filled it with modern American songs from artists like “Rihanna”, “GaGa”, and “Yeah Yeah Yeah”, TV Shows like “The Office”, “The Hills”, and “Rock of Love”, and he selected websites such as Digg and CollegeHumor, as well as his own Facebook page.
Explaining about his Facebook pick, Obama said, “This way she can friend me and we can chat anytime.”
For her homepage, Obama selected “Parezhilton.com”, a site which helps you find what you’re looking for without Google.
But, doesn’t our president sound like a high-schooler? Chatting on his Facebook with his friends all day? Granted, not every high-schooler has the Queen as his friend, but… Well, aren’t they both world leaders? Don’t they both have something better to do than talk about their bff’s? Or, maybe the Queen doesn’t have time to surf “CollegeHumor.com”.
Evidently, the queen loved the gift. Of course she did… it was a token of remembrance to the time she met the Great Messiah Obama.

BabyWatch

Oklahoma may be passing a bill allowing pregnant mothers to kill to protect their unborn. Lawmakers have already passed the “Use of Force for the Protection of the Unborn Act” last week, and, if it passes the state Senate, it will be on the governor’s desk to be signed.
It stemmed from Michigan, where a woman stabbed her boyfriend to death after he tried to murder the mother’s quadruplets by punching her in the stomach. However, she not only lost her babies, but she was convicted of manslaughter.
"Pregnant women who refuse to abort their child are too often attacked by their partner in an effort to force a miscarriage," said state Rep. Mike Thompson, "Women put in this position should have the legal right to defend themselves, with lethal force if necessary."
Surprisingly, this is a large step for us pro-lifers. This, as well as “Lacy and Connor’s Law”, will help the public realize that an unborn baby is still a human life.
“Lacy and Connor’s Law” was put in effect after Scott Peterson murdered his wife, Lacy, and her unborn child, known as Connor, in 2001. He was charged with two counts of murder for this heinous crime.
In my opinion, that gave certain rights to the child, disavowing abortion. How can one kill an unborn with a knife at home and be charged with murder, but not even be arrested if done by surgical removal?
If a woman can kill her boyfriend for trying to harm her unborn baby, why is it okay for a doctor to kill her unborn baby?
But, the people don’t know about these laws. They only hear about Roe vs. Wade, and other groundbreaking abortion laws. Never laws that tell us of the babies rights.